Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lary Doe's avatar

Having grown up in a 2-parent household with both fulltime employed in high paying jobs (I'm 53 so you can do the regression yourself!), my co-hort of classmates growing up diverged based on how they utilized their opportunity.

One of the stories I love to tell my wife is how some of the very same people who grew up with designer everything and handouts from the Bank of Mom & Dad™️never learned the value of working or money. Today some are comfortable and others struggling because the decisions they made were predicated on an outcome others earned. (We all have stories about a rich kid who blew every chance, I grew up in a school with too many of them.)

Programs like "Fresh Air Kids" gave inner-city youths the opportunity to see life outside the "concrete jungle" and every study has shown the influence of classmates of differing income levels seeing "home life" for the others and the positive impact it can have.

Seeing the possible outcomes, both positive and negative, are high motivators when properly constructed. Constrast Bias is dangerous when parents, teachers or role-models say "Why can't you be like Mike?" (Charles Barkely's commercial about not being a role-model is a wider argument for individual acheivement then he probably considered at the time.)

*In the current state of Geo-politics, picking up a copy of "Prisoners of Geography" may help answer some of the foundational issues we face today based on choices made centuries ago.

Antowan Batts's avatar

I stand here today on my soap box to explain wht this topic is part of what keeps me up at night.

I am a big fan of John Rawls whose A theory of justice postulates the concept of the veil of ignorance. If you could start agaian and spawn in a random point of socuety to start over as a child would you do it. Mostcof us would likely say no. I had it rough but even i know it could have been worse.

This is how Rawls explains we must design just societies. A society in which everyone would be willing to take that bet. This has always reminded me of todays letter. The thing is this isn't new our research has just gotten better and we can better describe the direct impact.

Im not an idealist. We cannot have a perfect society but i believe that we can have one where luck is not the determining factor for whether you will have a good life or not. Great news letter as always!

No posts

Ready for more?