What I’m Watching Today
April 28th, 2026
Today is a good example of how economics, policy, and technology are colliding in real time. Three threads matter right now:
1. Oil, Geopolitics, and Inflation Risk
I joined the radio show in Chicago (WCPT 820) this week to discuss a scenario I flagged earlier: oil pushing toward extreme levels. Thanks to Bill Muck for the invite to share my views on the economy.
Recent Reuters reporting shows prices rising again as tensions with Iran escalate and negotiations stall.
What matters:
Oil is one of the fastest channels from geopolitics → inflation
If prices continue rising, we’re looking at renewed cost-push inflation
That complicates everything for policymakers
Even though the U.S. is a net exporter of oil, Americans will still see higher prices at the pump because oil prices are market-driven and global oil flows are lower today.
My take: The “$200 oil” scenario is still a tail risk—but it’s no longer unrealistic. Markets are starting to price in instability, not just supply.
2. The Fed’s Real Problem Isn’t Rates
The Federal Reserve meets today and tomorrow. Markets expect no change to interest rates. But, that’s not the story.
The real issue is Jerome Powell’s position.
Here’s the tension:
The labor market is softening
Oil-driven inflation could reaccelerate
Policy uncertainty remains high
These signals point in opposite directions:
Weak labor implies cut rates
Rising inflation implies hold or hike
This is the typical issue we face when experiencing stagflation. The U.S economy is in a predicament.
My take: This isn’t about this meeting. It’s about whether the Fed is entering a phase where policy becomes reactive instead of predictive.
Also worth watching: whether Powell stays on after his term. Leadership transitions at moments like this matter more than markets admit. Chairs usually leave the board once their term ends, but political interference with the Fed might lead Powell to stay on longer.
3. AI Is Forcing a New Kind of Property Right
Taylor Swift is attempting to trademark her voice and image to prevent AI misuse. Last week, lawyers acting on behalf of the music superstar lodged three applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
At the same time, Oprah Winfrey is moving her content ecosystem to Amazon—leaning further into platform-controlled distribution.
These aren’t separate stories. They point to the same shift:
Who owns digital identity?
Who controls distribution?
Who captures value in an AI-driven economy?
My take: We’re watching the early formation of AI-era property rights—voice, likeness, and content libraries. This will reshape contracts, media, and labor markets.
The Through Line
These stories connect: Oil is driving inflationary pressure, inflation is affecting the Fed’s strategy because labor markets send a different signal about the economy, labor markets are changing as AI reshapes value creation, and the meaning of productivity.
The environment ahead is more volatile and uncertain, and requires careful interpretation. Markets have been resilient to all that has been thrown at them. When will they begin to price in risk and uncertainty?
What I’m Watching Next
Whether oil continues trending upward this week
Powell’s tone (not just the rate decision)
More public figures moving to lock down AI rights



Crazy to think we need to copyright our existence now.
The Powell "situation" isn't resolved within the legal realm. The smart play is continuing on as a Governor for the protection of The Fed picking up the legal bills. While it's unlikely that the IG will find anything beyond explanable cost increases, Powell would have to be naive in a way we've never seen to give up those protections.
Lisa Cook is the situation people speak less often about. That has teeth if the current Adminstration finds a way to change the unique protections the Supreme Court cutout for them.
Oprah is learning that the cost of production is increasingly higher and becoming a sub-brand of Wondery is a smart play. Personally I don't think she's as culturally relevant as she was 15 yrs ago. Pushing Tina Knowles' book? The latest Wally Lamb? Her own diet advice? Lisa Marie Presley's memoir? These sound like the "Chardonnay with Ice" crowd suggestions!
At least we know Amazon wants the ad revenue sharing and tracking purchase information, of which Oprah must be getting a percentage from Affliate Links! (I hate Hollywood/Fame Culture and the negative aspects of how they warp perception in quality by abusing Authority Bias. Matt Damon pushing Crypto ring a bell!)