Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jadrian Wooten's avatar

It's really interesting to look back and see that the concerns we had about Powell didn't pan out as expected. Perhaps having a lawyer in the spot in times like these isn't such a bad idea. Powell's understanding of precedent has made him a solid chair.

Lary Doe's avatar

Let's start with the basic premise that Warsh agreed to make every effort to lower interest rates. Trump's public statements to that effect, that he wouldn't nominate someone with a differing point-of-view, make that obvious.

The sidenote of Warsh's Father-in-Law, Robert Lauder (of Estee Lauder fame) being not only a large financial backer of the current President but also the main proponent for annexing Greenland, creates another point of consideration.

Warsh gave an interview during the Pandemic (Hoover Institute, April 2, 2020) where he talked about monetary policy needing to be dovish during "peace" and hawkish during times of conflict. That's where our current political policies create the conflict. We're not in a shooting war but an economic one.

How he navigates the inflation that may result from all of the announced Direct Foreign Investment, a consumption cycle vastly different from 2008-09, and labor offsets as AI shifts job functions.

*All of this changes should the Democrats assume legislative control after November 2026 elections. They would reassert themselves via oversight and Constitutional authority making several current policy positions moot.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?